Web under development, something new will be here, we will be back soon, old data can still be seen but can't get the latest update. stay tuned! | Powered by Yusa Kurobane
Loading...
We will listen to your criticism and suggestions, and will improve the quality and add accurate data regularly.
"Due to the abundance of free time, this project was possible."
1. Due to poor hosting and internet specifications, this website's performance could be said to be bad. I apologize for any inconvenience when visiting this website
2. due to a problem, data and development on this website has been delayed for quite a long time. Don't worry, the data on this site can still be seen
3. The new look and features will be released later this month (if I'm not lazy)
Maintenance Schedule:
No | Hardware | Benchmark | Score | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
TOSHIBA MK6459GSXP | CrystalDiskMark | Read: 0 MB/s Write: 0 MB/s |
04 June 2024 20:18 | |
TOSHIBA MK6459GSXP | AS-SSD | Read: 0 MB/s Write: 0 MB/s |
25 May 2024 11:56 | |
TOSHIBA MK6459GSXP | H2testw | Read: 0 MB/s Write: 0 MB/s |
27 March 2024 12:47 | |
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 | AS-SSD | Read: 67.19 MB/s Write: 65.31 MB/s |
28 February 2024 08:51 | |
Intel Core i5 6300U | HWBOT x265 - 4K | 2.148 FPS | 15 February 2024 23:00 |
No | Name | Type |
---|---|---|
AnTuTu Benchmark v10 (Mobile) - Storage Test | Disks | |
AnTuTu Benchmark v10 (Mobile) - GPU | Videocards | |
AnTuTu Benchmark v9 (Mobile) - GPU | Videocards | |
AnTuTu Benchmark v10 (Mobile) - CPU | Processors | |
AnTuTu Benchmark v9 (Mobile) - CPU | Processors |
No | Hardware | Type | Upload Date |
---|---|---|---|
TOSHIBA MK6459GSXP | Disks | 01 April 2024 19:33 | |
Kingston Canvas Select Plus MicroSDXC 64GB | Disks | 07 March 2024 12:18 | |
Maestromemory MicroSDXC 128GB | Disks | 23 February 2024 09:51 | |
Samsung KMQD60013M-B318 | Disks | 18 February 2024 09:20 | |
Imagination PowerVR Rogue GE8320 650MHz | Videocards | 15 February 2024 10:58 |
Hardware List is a project to test the performance of several hardware whose data has been validated and guaranteed to be accurate. The data in this project is accurate for years or even a lifetime, this project is under the control of "Hakim Yusa" with the name "Re-Life Hardware List" with revised version v1.1
The main goal of this project is to document hardware and test (benchmark) existing hardware, either synthetically or in real world scenarios, but the data we have is mostly synthetic.
This project is a long-term project or even a lifetime project because every year there will be new hardware and the data here will definitely be updated regularly.
The project and website are independent and not affiliated with any party.
Here we only discuss Synthesis Testing (Synthesis Benchmark) and do not discuss gaming and rendering performance.
All tests here only use one of the many pieces of hardware on the market. The test results cannot be used as a benchmark for the performance of the hardware, it all depends on the system and cooling you use, especially since most of the laptops were tested, of course not all laptops with the same specifications have the same system and cooling, just use it as a reference.
The data here is 100% tested by me and I try to be as accurate as I can and avoid anomalous data. To increase accuracy, some of the benchmark software here is integrated with the HWBOT website, the benchmark software website itself, as well as screenshots of the system and benchmark software. for example in the link:
HWBOT : https://hwbot.org/submission/5090907
Geekbench : https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/17724444
For storage media testing, I only use one product to try out of the many mass-produced products, maybe the results will be different, it could be faster than existing data or even slower, it all depends on capacity, hardware, software, operating system, factors from the brand manufacturer itself, and others.
Some of the Hard disks/SSDs tested used Orico brand Enclosures (changing Internal Hard disks/SSDs to External) with random models, of course we used USB 3.0 models to get maximum speed from the Hard disks/SSDs, to find out which Hard disks/SSDs use Enclosures, you can see from a picture of the hardware
Apart from using enclosures from the Orico brand, I also use other brands such as Taffware and others, which of course uses a USB 3.0 interface.
Apart from that, I try to avoid inaccurate data due to my own mistakes, such as a USB 3.0 flash disk with a reading speed in the box of 100MB/s, when I tried it the reading speed was only around 30 MB/s, after checking it turned out that the USB on the laptop was only USB 2.0.
For MicroSD and SD Cards, I use a Card Reader with a VENTION brand USB 3.0 Interface (GL3224 Controller) to get the speed it should, apart from using a VENTION brand Card Reader I also use a LEXAR Brand Card Reader with model RW450 rev B (GL3231S Controller) which has Higher reading speed compared to VENTION Card Reader with GL3224 controller. If I use the Card Reader built into the IdeaPad Slim 3i 14ITL6 laptop which only runs on USB 2.0, the speed will decrease because USB 2.0 only has a transfer speed of 30 MB/s.
Actually, RAM Disks and VRAM Disks are not permanent storage media and their function is not to store data, but with the help of some software, the hardware can store data, so because this hardware can store data like a hard disk, I consider it a storage medium.
There are several MicroSDs, Flashdisks and several other storage media whose origins are unclear, such as no brand, model, the brand is different physically from the one on the computer, and so on. To overcome this problem, I used the initials RETF (Re-Life TransFlash / MicroSD) for MicroSD, REUSB (Re-Life USB) for flash disks, and added certain codes that were on the physical device, and ran tests using H2testw software to test whether The written capacity is appropriate or not, if it is appropriate then it will be included in the data, if it is not suitable then the hardware will be thrown away because it is not suitable to be used as storage media.